So why are so many Democrats biting their fingernails about Lt. Gov. John Cherry Jr. being their gubernatorial nominee in 2010? Especially since Cherry hasn't even announced yet.
And if there's such angst over Cherry not being able to beat a Republican-to-be-named-later, is there a realistic alternative?
To anyone but a Lansing insider, these questions sound weird. It's September 2009. Michigan isn't going to pick a Granholm's successor for 14 months. How can anyone seriously be paying attention to this?
It's because anyone seriously interested in being Michigan's 48th governor started laying the groundwork around Valentine's Day, if not earlier. It takes time to raise money, build support, craft a plan, practice messaging and cobble together a campaign staff for a statewide race.
At this point, "the L.G." is the only Democrat making headway on all of these fronts. "Whole Lot of People Supporting Cherry" puts out seemingly weekly endorsement lists from a new fleet of local officials and mid-level union groups.
But the enthusiasm among Democrats resembles a cafeteria lunch line the day meatloaf and mashed potatoes highlight the menu.
"I'm in a lot of Democrat circles," said political consultant Bob Kolt. "People talk to me, and what people are saying is that they'll go to a fundraiser and John Cherry will speak and they'll say, 'Oh, my God. He's our guy?'"
For those who know Cherry personally, this talk is hard to hear. Find a more approachable, knowledgeable and experienced person working under the Capitol dome. Or find a follower of state government who doesn't think Cherry would make a far better governor than Granholm or any other state official, for that matter.
On top of that, he's a regular guy. He walks the treadmill at the downtown YMCA, for crying out loud.
Cherry led the state Senate Democratic caucus from 1996 to 2002, but he didn't gain any real statewide name ID until the day Jennifer Granholm tapped him to be her running mate in 2002. And here lies the pit in Cherry's gubernatorial ambitions.
He's still seen as "her man."
Now, as state government braces for another shutdown due to collapsing state revenue, Cherry is stuck taking another one for the team — getting blasted by political adversaries as being part of the "Granholm-Cherry" administration without being the one calling the shots.
Unlike Granholm, Cherry doesn't have the public charisma and camera-ready presence to make everything sound OK on the evening news and the radio talk shows.
"From a Republican perspective, we would love John Cherry to be the Democratic nominee," said Denise DeCook, a Republican political consultant with the Marketing Resource group.
Who Is John Cherry?
Born May 5, 1951, to John Sr. and Margaret Cherry in the small town of Montrose in Genesee County, Cherry was the first of four children.
John Sr. installed corporate tele phone lines for the local telephone company. Margaret was a stay-athome mom until the kids got a little older. Then she worked at the county's animal control department.
In high school, John Jr. rounded up his younger sister, Deb, and about eight of their buddies and created a student political action group. The teenagers interviewed political candidates. They endorsed their favorites and then knocked doors for their endorsees.
"Even though our candidates didn't always win their election, they won Montrose Township," Deb Cherry beamed. "Every single one of them."
Among those ultimately benefiting from the student action was John Sr., who ran and won township supervisor.
John Jr., a University of Michigan graduate, ended up working for then state Sen. Gary Corbin of Clio. He also served as the political director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.
The year 1982 was pivotal for John Jr. Redistricting created a favorable House district for John, but he was torn between running for it and joining the priesthood for the Episcopal Church.
Either way he went, he was well suited for the task, said Deb Cherry, now a state senator.
"He's always been a person people could talk to," she said. "He understands what people need and want. He's also able to solve problems very well. He works with people really well, and his word is good, and that's what's important."
John Jr. ran for the state House seat and won. He continued his legislative career in the state Senate, where he was elevated to the post of floor leader and then leader from 1996 to 2002.
Term limits ended his legislative career, but in his last year of office, union officials talked up labor-friendly Cherry to Democratic gubernatorial nominee Jennifer Granholm. Cherry's biggest selling point: His 20 years of state government experience dwarfed Granholm's four as state attorney general. She'd need an experienced hand to deal with the Legislature.
The two were the antithesis of each other. She was the former California beauty queen with a Harvard education and a law degree. He came from blue-collar Genesee County and made his living as a public policy expert. She exuded "movie star." He was someone you felt like you could throw back beers with.
The contrast was perfect. Onto the 2002 gubernatorial ticket went John Cherry Jr.
Granholm-Cherry, linked at the hip
Since being sworn in as lieutenant governor, Granholm used her No. 2 for special assignments.
First, he helped monitor a landuse task force. Then he dived into a study of how to double the state's college-educated population. His most recent charge is to shave off state government redundancies and consolidate the bureaucracy's 17 departments, multiple offices and divisions.
He's carried her water in budget discussions. He cast the politically destructive tie-breaking "yes" vote on both the income tax increase and sales tax expansion to services during the four-hour state government shutdown in 2007.
Granholm has taken heat lately for her perceived lack of leadership and her evolving positions. Through it all, Cherry has done what's been asked without a public hint of negative commentary.
That's great, say political observers. It's got to stop, for his own sake.
Granholm-Cherry, the break to come?
A "State of the State" survey last month from Michigan State University had Granholm's approval rating at 29 percent. Rasmussen Reports put her approval rating at 44 percent.
Voters either don't know John Cherry or know that he's Granholm’s wingman.
An EPIC/MRA poll from May had Cherry at 14 percent in a Democratic primary, second to the U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow's 49 percent. (Stabenow has made it clear she isn’t up for a '10 run.)
That isn't the end of Cherry's troubles, though.
In hypothetical head-to-head matchups with potential Republican opponents, Cherry is underperforming, according to EPIC/MRA Pollster Bernie Porn's analysis published earlier this summer in MIRS, a capital== newsletter.
For example, Cherry leads Attorney General Mike Cox by one point, 36 to 35 percent, trails Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land (who isn't running) 35 to 34 percent, and leads U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra 36 to 33 percent. It's close, but with Michigan performing so well for Democrats in recent years, Porn said Cherry is 11 to 12 points behind where a Democrat should be.
Porn also wrote that Granholm's current negative poll numbers are much worse than Gov. John Engler's poll numbers in September 2001, when then-Lt. Gov. Dick Posthumus was putting together his gubernatorial operation. Posthumus ultimately lost in 2002, raising the concern that Granholm could be a bigger albatross around the neck of Cherry than Engler was for Posthumus.
"Comparing the challenges of 2010 with 2002, . . . our recent May survey would strongly suggest that Cherry could have an even greater challenge in keeping the office for Democrats," Porn wrote. "However, it is obviously very early and a lot can happen over the next year."
Once the 2010 budget situation settles down and Cherry actually becomes an announced gubernatorial candidate (his operation is setting up under the "exploratory" label), Cherry needs to distance himself from Granholm, said one political consultant.
The Michigan Republican Party and some of the Republican gubernatorial candidates have been publicly tying Michigan's horrible economy and astronomical unemployment numbers to the "Granholm-Cherry" administration since Barack Obama beat John McCain.
"Running on the Granholm record is a recipe for defeat," the insider said. "He's got to embrace some principles that embody change. Government reform. Antiestablishment. Whatever. He's got to shake it up. . . . He's can't be the Granholm guy. He's got to break ranks and go after the Legislature. If he's the status quo, look out."
As far as political adversaries connecting him with Granholm, Cherry said in a brief interview: "They're going to push it, but the Republicans have their share of problems, too.
"In the end, I'm my own person," Cherry added. "I think I'll be able to demonstrate that and make it clear that I'm not Jennifer Granholm. I've got my own personality. I'm my own person. I've got my own agenda and my own vision. I'll be able to communicate that during the course of a campaign."
If not Cherry, then who?
Unless your name is John Cherry, stunningly few followers of state government think you're going to be the Democrats' gubernatorial nominee in 2010.
A MIRS Insiders' survey earlier this spring found that 80 percent believe Cherry stands the greatest chance of winning the nomination. Of the two announced candidates, Rep. Alma Wheeler Smith received 1 percent and former Rep. John Freeman received zero.
Smith, of Washtenaw County's Salem Township, is a 14-year veteran of the Legislature. She's a sharp, nononsense customer who'd have the kahonies to pass a balanced budget chock full of revenue enhancements tomorrow because she'd believe it's the right thing to do.
Her strength isn't in pulling together the posse and loading up the bank account for statewide runs. She abandoned her 2002 gubernatorial run to become David Bonior's running mate until Granholm knocked out the former Macomb County congressman.
Freeman, of the Oakland County enclave of Madison Heights, was termed out of the House in 1998. Most recently, he's spent his time as the Michigan director of Health Care for America Now, an organization trying to enact national health care reform legislation.
Neither Smith nor Freeman has managed more than 1 or 2 percentage points in most polls taken on the gubernatorial race.
"It's not a question of quality, it's a question of access," said one Democratic political observer. "As lieutenant governor, John Cherry can hold a fundraiser and get $500 checks. How does Alma put together the network just to get the signatures needed to get on the ballot? How does John Freeman get the legal work done for his petitions? That is not a small task. Lawyers aren't free."
Michigan State University Trustee George Perles says he's running for governor, but few political observers are taking him seriously. Wayne County Executive Bob Ficano is keeping his name out there as a possibility, but most folks are writing him off as using his "unknown" status as a political bargaining chip.
The race's one wild card is House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford Twp. near Detroit.
His "is-he-in-or-is-he-out?" dance is keeping the Lansing political scene guessing, particularly after he burned every public employee union in town when he uncorked his health care pooling idea.
"I do think he's going to get in," said Joe DiSano of MainStreet Strategies. "It's pretty clear that his health care initiative is directly designed toward the gubernatorial campaign.
"He would capture a lot of 'Starbucks' Democrats — those are folks not affiliated with organized labor, more affluent that the average Democratic primary voter, and I don't know if there's enough of those folks in a nonpresidential year to win this primary."
Republican strategist Denise DeCook said that by poking a stick in labor's eye and working closely with the business group Detroit Renaissance, Dillon is moving to the political middle, which makes her wonder what type of information he has on Michigan's electorate.
"I don't believe in coincidences in politics, and it's no coincidence that he is very actively going after labor and courting Republicans. . . . I just don't know how that helps him in a primary," she said.
The other problem for Dillon is that if he's serious about waiting until after the budget mess to make a formal decision, he's going to be "hopelessly late" getting into the race, as one insider put it. Michigan is a big state to campaign in. And there are a lot of party activists a gubernatorial candidate would need to meet and, ideally, meet again.
"I find him to be genuine and honest but strategically, he's made so many mistakes," Kolt said. "I don't know how he can get Democratic support. … The Dillon message is that John Cherry can't win the general election, but I'm not sure that's a winning message."
Cherry v. GOP T.B.A.
The Republican gubernatorial contest isn't nearly as clear cut.
The current field features Cox, Holland’s Hoekstra, Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard, Ann Arbor businessman Rick Snyder and state Sen. Tom George of Kalamazoo.
And here in lies the hope for a Cherry-led Democratic ticket. None of the five is unbeatable, said one Democratic consultant who broke down the each potential Republican opponent this way:
• Snyder, a multi-millionaire venture capitalist who can write his own checks, is a political novice who knows painfully little about state government and comes with baggage from his time as CEO of Gateway Computers that Michigan Democratic Party Chairman Mark Brewer is sure to exploit for sending jobs overseas.
• Hoekstra isn't tied to the state budget/state government problem in any way, but he's not known well outside his home district in West Michigan and can framed as a hand-holder of former President George Bush.
• Cox comes from the right part of the state — southeast Michigan — has excellent name ID and has done well as AG, but he "has an anger management problem." It's all but certain that his quick defense of former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and the alleged Manoogian Mansion party will find its way onto a campaign ad, as will the bizarre 2005 melodrama with Geoffrey Fieger and his confessed affair (although neither seemed to hurt him in his '06 re-election efforts).
• Bouchard's campaign seemingly went dark after bagging a key endorsement from Land. How it will recover will be an interesting test. Cox is gobbling up the attention and money in southeast Michigan.
• George generated some publicity after he was invited, uninvited and re-invited to a gubernatorial debate later this month on Mackinac Island, but it's hard to see him making a serious run.
Everything will be all right. Right?
For all those Democrats, completely freaked about a Democratic gubernatorial nominee John Cherry, DiSano is trying to talk them off the ledge.
"The concerns are more about Lansing insiders complaining about this," he said. "Even though Granholm has not been a great governor, I don't think people are willing to blame John Cherry for the sins of Jennifer Granholm."
Or will they?
Since he's only well known among political insiders, doesn't that make him one, too? Are voters going to be looking for that in 14 months?
"John Cherry is highly connected to Jennifer Granholm. He's got some swimming upstream to do," said DeCook.
That may be true. But, remember, she's a Republican.