|
|

By
DANIEL STURM
Seven years after the implementation of Michigan’s school-of-choice
law, Lansing public schools are feeling the heat. Recently Gov. Jennifer
Granholm became the best-known Lansing parent to take advantage of the
option to send her children to a school district other than the one
they live in. Her daughters are going to school in East Lansing.
Granholm joins the ranks of more than 1,200 parents who’ve chosen
to transfer their children out of the Lansing school district since
1996, when the law took effect.
This trend intensifies an overall decline in funding for the Lansing
School District. Due to population decline, Lansing has lost more than
3,500 students since 1980, a decrease which has cost them more than
$23 million. In Michigan, funding for education is tallied according
to the number of students enrolled, with each school district receiving
an average of $6,900 in state funds per student.
Before 1996, parents who wanted to send their children to schools outside
of their own district needed to obtain permission or else pay tuition.
But since Section 105 of the State School Aid Act, also known as the
“school-of-choice” law, was adopted by the Michigan legislature
in 1996, all of this has changed.

Daniel Sturm/City Pulse |
| Sharon
E. Banks, superintendent of the Lansing School District, reveals
plans for a prototype design from an already constructed middle
school in Detroit. Lansing wants to replace Pattengill Middle School,
because the 1920 building has dim lighting, dangerous wiring and
a chronically leaky pool. |
The
new legislation made it easier for parents to decide where to educate
their children, giving them the option to move to a different school,
either within or outside of their own district.
School-of-choice policies have become popular nationally since the mid-‘90s.
According to the Denver-based think tank, Education Commission of the
States, 35 states nationwide have enacted open-enrollment policies that
are similar to those in Michigan.
And between 1996 and 2002 a clear trend has emerged: Mid-Michigan parents
are using the policies to opt out on Lansing schools. In the last six
years, Lansing has attracted 287 school-of-choice students from elsewhere
— but has lost 1,206 to other districts. Total student enrollment
has declined from 20,336 in 1995 to 17,323 at the end of the 2001-02
school year.
This has been due in part to a population decrease. But school-of-choice
has cost the Lansing School District $6 million per year from its budget,
or roughly 3.5 percent of the district’s annual budget.
‘Perverse
incentives’
David N. Plank, the director of Michigan State University’s Education
Policy Center, is studying the impact of school-of-choice policies on
Michigan public schools. In a 2000 study, Plank assesses that the new
policy is creating “perverse incentives that work against the
accomplishments of key public purposes.” Plank and his colleagues
concluded that Michigan’s new laws “encourage [public schools]
to recruit students who are less costly to educate.”
David
Plank |
The
researchers found that since 1996 Michigan students have begun to migrate
from poorer school districts to districts with higher family incomes
and a lower concentration of minorities. “Student transfers reinforce
longstanding patterns of community growth and decline that originate
in the residential housing market,” wrote Plank.
According to the Michigan Department of Education, the Lansing School
District has a significantly higher number of minority students when
compared with neighboring regions. Sixty percent of Lansing students
are minorities versus 34 percent of students in East Lansing.
Since the inception of the school-of-choice legislation, East Lansing
public schools appear to be the most attractive choice. A district with
3,600 students, East Lansing has gained 531 additional school-of-choice
students, but has lost a mere 74 – that’s a $3.5 million
boost in their annual revenue from 1996-2002.
At a candidate’s meeting last week in preparation for the Nov.
4 Board of Education election, Sharon E. Banks, superintendent of the
Lansing School District, says they’ve been fighting a series of
negative trends. “The old times where people were working for
General Motors are gone, and the percentage of our wealthier residents
is decreasing,” Banks said. The superintendent referred to a recent
study conducted by MSU researcher Bettie Landauer-Menchik showing the
number of upper-income Lansing residents, or those residents making
more than $80,000 per year, has dropped to 11 percent below the state
average. “Lansing is falling further behind,” Banks said..
Banks said that while the district lost 7.4 percent of its population
since 1990, student enrollment has declined by 24 percent.

Housing
a factor
When asked how she plans to reverse this negative trend, the superintendent
said she recently became the chairwoman of the Lansing’s newly
formed Housing Commission. Lansing School District’s press spokesman,
Mark Mayes, elaborated on why housing is a relevant to improving the
schools. A large percentage of Lansing’s inexpensive housing is
set aside for senior citizens, and its less expensive apartments are
too small to be suited for young families. “We need to be more
attractive for parents with children of school-age,” Mayes said.
Banks admits that the school district is not only fighting a barrel
full of negative economic trends but also an uphill battle over its
crumbling image. Prior to Granholm’s decision, Banks was forced
to publicly comment on the fact that mayoral candidate Virg Bernero
transferred his two daughters out of the Lansing school district –
in which his wife, Teri, is a principal — to schools in Holt and
East Lansing. Bernero’s explanation that his older daughter, Kelly,
had been harassed by other pupils at Gardner Middle didn’t create
a good image.
In retrospect, Banks said self-critically at the candidates’ meeting,
she should have more aggressively commented on the bad example Bernero
was setting. Banks remembers how “petrified” she was when
a TV reporter asked her to comment Bernero’s decision. “It
took me off-guard. Bernero’s kids had been gone for two years,
and I didn’t know why they left, because the senator never met
with me. I said ‘People have a choice, and I feel that we have
a great school system.’ But now I feel I should have been more
aggressive.”
The decisions of Granholm and Bernero represent a critical assessment
on the part of Lansing elite families. But how are other parents rating
the Lansing School District, and the school-of-choice legislation?
A
learning environment
Lansing resident Ulyana Maystrenko decided to transfer her daughter
Sofia from Lansing’s Dwight Rich Middle School on Hampden Drive
to East Lansing High School in 2001, where she believes her daughter
is receiving a more balanced education.
“It was a tough decision, because we very much supported the Lansing
School District,” says Maystrenko. While other parents were transferring
their children to East Lansing because of allegedly better teaching
quality, Maystrenko says they chose East Lansing because of the social
environment.
“Kids
in Lansing thought my daughter was a little weird, because she liked
learning,” says Maystrenko, who teaches massage therapy at Lansing
Community College. “I wanted my daughter to be in an atmosphere
where more people are interested in learning.”
While working as a volunteer for the Lansing School District, Maystrenko
encountered many children who came from homes with social problems,
even homeless children, and they brought these troubles with them to
the classroom. She recalls talking with a boy who always got into fights
at school. “I said we don’t hit people at school. And he
said, ‘My dad hits me, and my mom hits me!”
Elaine
Yaw/City Pulse |
|
Ulyana Maystrenko chats with her daughter, Sofia, Tuesday morning
before Sofia leaves their Moores River Drive home to travel across
town to East Lansing High School. |
Maystrenko believes that she isn’t prejudiced against urban public
schools. “I grew up in New York, and went to inner-city public
schools, where I did very well. So it’s not that I’m running
away from the big city.” But it became obvious to her that teachers
in Lansing endured more stress than elsewhere, because in addition to
teaching they had to worry more about keeping their classes in order.
After having been at East Lansing High School for two years now, Maystrenko
thinks her daughter found a much better learning environment than she
ever had in Lansing. “It’s not that everybody in East Lansing
understands her now. But she’s got a little group of friends who
don’t think it’s strange that she loves art and that she’s
interested in psychology.”
Sofia’s mother observes a greater “push to do homework”
in East Lansing, and more parental involvement. “In Lansing there
were many more kids who never had a book read to them.”
Asked
what she would suggest to improve the learning environment in Lansing
schools, Maystrenko said: “There could be more programs in elementary
schools for adults to read to the children, just for fun. Let them sit
in a circle, and read them stories!” Maystrenko believes Lansing
should be commended for offering a larger variety of foreign languages
than smaller school districts, but that the district isn’t selling
these strengths well enough. “My daughter had French in elementary
school, and she loved Japanese in middle school.” That was the
only reason she didn’t want to switch schools.”
Taking a very contrasting approach, in 2002 Lansing resident Joan Nelson
transferred her 13-year-old son Peter out of a private Montessori school
and into Pattengill Middle School on Jerome Street. Nelson believes
Lansing public schools are more socially and economically diverse than
private schools, and schools in East Lansing. “Lansing kids are
less clickish. It was important to me that the student body be rich
and diverse,” says Nelson, who is the director of the Allen Neighborhood
Center on Lansing’s east side.
At Pattengill, her son attends what she calls a “challenging”
honors program, led by a remarkable “caliber of staff,”
who use a team-teaching approach. Nelson points out that Pattengill
is federally funded by the 21st century School Program, which provides
additional funding for after-school programs such as chess, a band,
and cross-country skiing. She says that parents who transfer their children
to Okemos or East Lansing are simply unaware of Lansing’s diverse
educational offerings.
After graduating from Pattengill, Nelson’s son plans to enroll
in Eastern High School, which is just next door. Eastern is the only
Lansing area high school that offers a Russian language program. “Peter
plans to learn Russian, so that after graduating he can go to Moscow,
to improve his chess skills,” the mother laughed enthusiastically.
Nelson says that before choosing Pattengill she looked at other Middle
Schools in the area. “I was not impressed by the schools in East
Lansing, Okemos or elsewhere,” she said, adding she felt that
Lansing public schools were actually much better than their reputation.
Aside from offering a competitively high level of education, one she
felt is often ignored by the media, they offer also a richer social
experience than East Lansing schools.
Hugh Spagnuolo, an English teacher at Eastern High School, believes
that it is in fact due to the local media that Lansing public schools
have an increasingly bad reputation. He believes the media should differentiate,
rather than simplify. “We are like society overall, in that we
have the best people in the world, and we have the worst people in the
world.” The teacher said that Eastern students who later go to
college tell him how lucky they feel, to have been part of a diverse
learning environment. “In college they’re with people who
attended segregated (i.e. private) schools. These people have no real
perception of what life is like.”
Infrastructure
Ironically, the same Pattengill Middle School that Joan Nelson praises
is also at the center of a debate on how Lansing’s school are
supposedly falling apart. According to Banks, Pattengill, which was
built in 1920, has dim lighting, dangerous wiring, patched water pipes,
and a chronically leaky pool.
Banks said the negative image of the Lansing School District has much
to do with its outdated infrastructure. “Some people say buildings
don’t make education. But boy, it makes kids feel a lot better
when the lighting and everything is up to par,” Banks said.
The superintendent said she recently visited Holt Middle School to find
out why some of her students are leaving Lansing. “It’s
beautiful. There are some special amenities that are really important
to the kids. And that’s tough for us to overcome. “
Elaine
Yaw/City Pulse |
Even though Pattengill Middle School is badly deteriorating, Lansing
resident Joan Nelson has enrolled her son there because of educational
opportunities. |
In order to learn more about the situation, I visited Pattengill Middle
School, where I met with school board candidate Kathleen Langschwager.
Between 1976 and 1998, Langschwager’s five children attended Pattengill
Middle School and went on to graduate from nearby Eastern High. Langschwager,
a retired Michigan National Bank accounting specialist, was a member
of the Lansing Board of Education from 1991 to 1996 and has recently
decided to run once again.
Standing in front of Pattengill’s crumbling front staircase, she
said: “It sometimes breaks my heart when I see that I sent my
children to Pattengill, while other parents sent their children to private
schools.” The building itself is encircled by a small patch of
green lawn, which is surrounded by parking lots. Across from the school
grounds, Sparrow Hospital is finishing the construction of a new 1,500-car
parking structure. The gray, dilapidated environment is perhaps not
the best physical environment for learning, a point to which Langschwager
agrees: “I think Lansing’s biggest problem is that Pattengill
is such a crippled school. If this was a state prison it would have
been closed 30 years ago.”
Once inside the building, we meet with Principal Linda Angel-Weinberg,
who takes us on a tour of some of the most problematic areas. We began
in room 123, a basement room in the catacombs of Pattengill, which until
recently has been flooded by the leaking swimming pool upstairs. Angel-Weinberg
said that before she became principal this basement room was where teachers
used to eat their lunch.
The principal, who sent three of her own children to Pattengill, said
she was concerned that mold in the basement resulting from the water
leaks, could endanger students with asthma. While working as an administrator
for the Ingham Intermediate School District during the 1990s, Angel-Weinberg
said she’s seen only one Middle School in Ingham County that was
worse than Pattengill. “I’m talking about Leslie Middle
School, but they’ve now rebuilt it.”
Langschwager said that people often come to Lansing in order to watch
a ball game, visit the Capitol, or to go to Sparrow Hospital. “When
they see this school building, they probably think ‘this is how
people treat their kids in Lansing.’ And they never see our other
beautiful schools!”
The last school buildings built in the Lansing district were Riddle
Middle School and Henry North Elementary School, both constructed in
1976. Superintendent Banks said during an interview that there is no
doubt that replacing Pattengill with a new building is their highest
priority for improving the district’s image. “Pattengill
is a centerpiece, and it’s time to go.”
During the meeting with school board candidates on Sept. 2, Banks revealed
plans for a prototype design of a recently constructed middle school
in Detroit that offered learning space for at least 750 children.
Lansing’s Board of Education voted unanimously Sept. 4 to place
a $74.9 million bond proposal onto the Nov. 4 ballot, in order to finance
the new structure. The proposal is divided into two sections. The first
includes $67.5 million for a new Pattengill Middle School, and provides
funding for renovations and science and computer labs for Dwight Rich,
Otto and Gardner Middle schools, as well as for a 12,000-square-foot
multi-purpose room for one of the magnet elementary schools.
The second asks for $7.4 million to build a new swimming and diving
pool that would be shared by Pattengill Middle School and the community
and also funds to make improvements to Sexton and Everett high schools’
athletic fields.
This proposal is much smaller than the $388.5 million bond proposal
voters defeated in May 2001. If passed, the owner of a $100,000 home
in Lansing would pay an extra $98 in annual property taxes.
Michigan State University researcher David Plank said that there is
no question that the district needs to do something about Pattengill.
“If you can’t build, then you can’t keep up.”
But even if the district builds a new middle school, “They’ll
have to ask for more money after this bond, because other schools have
needs, too.”
Plank points out that Lansing can’t keep up with suburban school
districts such as East Lansing, Waverly or Okemos, because their property
tax base is smaller. “Lansing is not in the worst shape, but it
is clearly as disadvantaged as Flint, Pontiac, Saginaw and other urban
districts.”
The educational policy specialist suggests the Michigan Legislature
consider adopting an addition to Proposal A passed in 1994, which shifted
the operational funding of schools from local school districts to the
state. “There needs to be some protection for those districts
that are rapidly losing students.”
Plank said districts like Lansing, which lose money due to declining
enrollment (Lansing recently lost $10 million from its $178 million
budget), must consequently eliminate programs, making them less attractive
to parents. Thus, they face a further decrease in enrollment and budget
cuts. “It becomes a cycle that feeds on itself.”
The professor said it was problematic that Proposal A didn’t provide
any money for facilities in Michigan, but only offered money for district
staff, books and utilities. Plank said his Education Policy Center is
currently working on a study that would recommend improvements for capital
funding in Michigan. The study is scheduled for release in October 2003.
Asked what else the Lansing School District could do to retain its students,
Plank said they should consider offering services smaller districts
can’t offer. “It could be specialized high schools that
focus on foreign language, or science and technology. That would be
difficult, but it might well draw kids into the district who otherwise
would go to suburban high schools.”
Plank said Lansing’s decision to offer magnet elementary schools
is a step in the right direction. “But I don’t know whether
they will aggressively market it.”
Referring to the example of city public schools in Dearborn, Kirk A.
Johnson and Elizabeth Moser argue in a study published by the Mackinac
Center for Public Policy that the school-of-choice program can be an
advantage to school districts that learn to better market themselves.
“Concurrent with Dearborn’s aggressive efforts to recruit
students, enrollment at Dearborn public schools increased from 13,857
in 1994–‘95 to 17,075 in 2000–01 even as competition
from neighboring school districts and charter schools has increased.”
Dearborn Public Schools adopted new art, technology, and a host of other
programs in addition to extending the school year and responding to
parent requests.
East Lansing also gives an example of a suburban school district that
has successfully utilized school-of-choice policies, as a tool for sustaining
student enrollment. Although East Lansing school enrollment has also
dropped — about 9 percent since 1993 — this significant
decline has slowed significantly since 1998, due to the district’s
successful utilization of the school-of-choice law to lock in students
from neighboring areas. Thus, whereas Lansing has lost 7 percent of
its student body since 1998, East Lansing’s enrollment has dropped
only 1.2 percent during this period.
East Lansing Superintendent Thomas Giblin (whose schopol board just
terminated his employment, effective in 12 months) said that the state
money provided by the roughly 100 school-of-choice students entering
his district per year is significant. “The only way to increase
funding is by increasing enrollment.”
Despite the fact that East Lansing has gained from the policy, Giblin
criticizes the overarching philosophy behind it. “Professionally
I’m disappointed with the legislation, because one of the things
you don’t do is to withdraw students from the urban center,”
he said.
The superintendent said he wishes the Michigan legislature would put
some money into the school system and enable Lansing to fix its crumbling
schools. “Some of their buildings are just deplorable, sub-standard,
while we just recently opened a brand new McDonald Middle School.”
The advocates of school-of-choice policies contend that competition
gives parents the power to vote with their feet, shaking up unquestioned
school district bureaucracies and spurring innovation in the process.
Schools that perform poorly will lose students, and without improvements
will be forced to close. The result would be better performance for
all students and more parental satisfaction with public schools.
A 2000 study of the University of Colorado at Boulder suggests that
this scenario may be a pipe dream. Rather than increasing overall student
performance, the study conducted in Colorado found that open enrollment
created a “zero sum game,” in which some schools did better
only at the expense of others doing worse.
Such assessments should give food for thought, for educational policy-makers
in Michigan. The Colorado study concludes: “While certain schools
spiral down, certain others, those schools gaining high scoring students,
thrive. And it is these latter schools who win awards for excellence
and receive coverage in the press for their exceptional curricula and
teaching.”
|
|